Saturday, January 24, 2009

Not Disheartened. Still Disappointed.

Commentor Invisible Man gently chided me for my previous post expressing my disappointment over the nomination of lobbyist Bill Lynn to the Pentagon. Alright, I'll calm down... just a little. I would have to say that I'm not seriously disheartened yet with Obama for doing this. I still have faith that his recent executive orders represent meaningful change. But, the degree of that change now has to come under some question. It is disappointing that a big show is made of enacting ethics and transparency rules and then just two days later those rules are waived. And not waived for someone in a small position, not waived for someone who really just has minor ties with lobbyists, but waived for someone about to enter a top position in the administration and who is intimately connected to a major defense contractor. From the Huffington Post:
[Raytheon] and its subsidiaries are a major force on Capitol Hill, having spent more than $14.5 million on federal lobbying activities during the six years Lynn was working there, according to a review of lobbying records. Raytheon worked to lobby the House, Senate, DARPA, Defense Department, Energy Department, Treasury Department, State Department, and others on issues ranging from long-range guided munitions, sea based missile defense and joint standoff weapon systems.

The government outreach efforts seemed to pay dividends. Raytheon Company received more than $54 billion in contracts from the federal government during that time period, according to fedspending.org, a project of OMB Watch. This doesn't include the potentially billions more that the company was awarded as a subcontractor or part of a group contract.

Isn't this exactly the kind of person that the rule was meant to cover? So far, I haven't read of any adequate explanation from the White House other than that Lynn is "uniquely qualified."

1 comment:

Invisible Man said...

Invisible man is kinda of a dick. -
I agree with you that it does seem an odd choice right after the no lobbyist rule. but i guess my point is that i think there are 2 group obama is going to come up against
1) the conservative crazies who see it as good and evil - and the bush was great and misunderstood, blah blah
and
2) the liberals who expect him not to be a politician with all the bad that comes from that

don't get me wrong, i still think he is the most inspirational president i have lived under just for the first 2 days, but i don't think he won't disappoint - often

but at least you are writing posts - i'm losing steam