Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Teams, Of Transitions And Rivals

From everything I've read so far, I just have to say that I have been very happy, even excited by Obama's transition process: He is focusing first on the White House staff, not the Cabinet (a mistake Bill Clinton made); he has appointed a total player, wonk and loyalist as Chief of Staff who seems to be about getting things done and knowing how to do it in a place like Washington; he has already begun to signal or outright state what his first priorities will be (the economy and energy); and, by the fact that he is considering having Gates and Clinton in his Cabinet he is assembling a "team of rivals" Linclon-style, which I love. This is a man who is not afraid of having a lot of strong and differing advice around him. Though it just occurred to me that Bush's cabinet looked this way at first -- remember that Rumsfeld the heavyweight was brought in to counter Powell the heavyweight -- it feels like Obama's choices, if they are Gates and Clinton, go much farther. First, Gates is a Republican, so this is a true oppositional voice. Also, he is a holdover from the Bush administration. Obama wants the whatever wisdom the Bush administration has accumulated inside his administration (unlike the Bushies who seemed to do everything the opposite of Clinton). Second, Clinton is a mega-star, known the world over. Her reputation and level of fame rivals his. To have someone who he ran against in a harsh campaign in his cabinet is a sign of real maturity. In this context the pick of Emanuel also looks good: such strong personalities need a strong hand to control them. In the first four Bush years Condi Rice got steamrolled as National Security Advisor (of course, it didn't help to have Cheney doing whatever he wanted). A strong chief of staff seems to signal a strong desire for centralized decision-making.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

To your point about how promising the Bush cabinet and staff looked: how does Obama plan on handling disagreement. Disagreement between him and a single member of his team (what if he disagrees with Hillary Clinton's recommendation on a topic: will she stand by her President the way Colin Powell did with honor and integrity or make it all about her and be the "I told him so" person.

Second, how to handle disagreement between factions. How to handle a Hillary / Bill Clinton team who disagrees with Secretary of Defense? Again, will Hillary and Bill make it about them instead of the the issues?

So all this talk in the media about Team of Rivals is great: but how did Lincoln handle the disagreements? Was Lincoln team ultimatley loyal to him? How do you ensure the balance between loyalty vs. nurturing healthy debate/conflict among the members. No one talks about these critical mechanics: they just like quoting Goodwin's book title without having read it. The answers are probably in Doris' details.